V. 81 N. 1 (2026)
Articoli Scientifici

Il verde urbano e la qualità dell’aria a Firenze

Jacopo Manzini
Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri (IRET), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
Elena Paoletti
Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri (IRET), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo 90133, Italy.
Barbara B. Moura
Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri (IRET), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo 90133, Italy.
Pierre Sicard
ACRI-ST, 260 route du Pin Montard, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis, Francia
Beatrice Sorrentino
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy, and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), CR Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.
Yasutomo Hoshika
Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri (IRET), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Palermo 90133, Italy.

Pubblicato 2026-04-02

Parole chiave

  • qualità dell’aria,
  • infrastrutture verdi,
  • salute umana,
  • inquinamento,
  • verde urbano

Come citare

Manzini , J., Paoletti, E., B. Moura , B., Sicard , P., Sorrentino , B., & Hoshika , Y. (2026). Il verde urbano e la qualità dell’aria a Firenze. L’Italia Forestale E Montana, 81(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.36253/ifm-1194

Abstract

Miliardi di persone sono esposte a livelli di inquinamento cittadino eccedenti gli standard normativi per la protezione della salute. Il verde urbano può certamente aiutare ad abbassare le concentrazioni dei principali inquinanti atmosferici quali particolato (PM), biossido d’azoto (NO2) ed ozono (O3) anche se la scelta delle specie arborea risulta basilare. Il modello FlorTree ha permesso di classificare 221 specie considerando l’assorbimento stomatico di NO2 ed O3, la deposizione del PM e l’O3-formazione dovuta all’emissione di composti organici volatili. Una web APP è stata sviluppata per individuare le specie migliori per la qualità dell’aria cittadina. In base a questi risultati, è stato piantato all’interno del Comune di Firenze un piccolo bosco urbano con tigli, olmi, aceri e cipressi per quantificare, tramite apposita sensoristica, la rimozione effettiva degli inquinanti da parte della vegetazione. Il monitoraggio biennale ha evidenziato una riduzione sotto chioma per NO2, O3 e PM. Inoltre, si è verificato il rispetto della regola 3-30-300 (3 alberi visibili dalla propria abitazione, 30% di copertura arborea nelle vicinanze, 300 metri di distanza da spazi verdi) a Firenze.  I risultati hanno mostrato come il 37% degli edifici non rispetti nessun criterio, dimostrando chiaramente come il rinverdimento urbano sia necessario per migliorare la qualità dell’aria e la salute delle persone. A Firenze la copertura arborea è circa il 17% (se consideriamo gli alberi più alti di 3 m) o 30% (se consideriamo anche arbusti e prati), ed è in grado di rimuovere dall’atmosfera inquinanti pericolosi. Se Firenze raggiungesse il 30% di copertura arborea, si potrebbero prevenire 57 morti premature per inquinamento atmosferico all’anno rispetto al 2019.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Abriha-Molnár, V. É., Szabó, S., Magura, T., Tóthmérész, B., Abriha, D., Sipos, B., & Simon, E. (2024). Environmental impact assessment based on particulate matter, and chlorophyll content of urban trees. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 19911. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70664-4
  2. Afifa Arshad, K., Hussain, N., Ashraf, M. H., & Saleem, M. Z. (2024). Air pollution and climate change as grand challenges to sustainability. Science of The Total Environment, 928, 172370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172370
  3. Astell-Burt, T., & Feng, X. (2020). Urban green space, tree canopy and prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: A multilevel longitudinal study of 46 786 Australians. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(3), 926–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz239
  4. Berger, M., Bastl, M., Bouchal, J., Dirr, L., & Berger, U. (2021). The influence of air pollution on pollen allergy sufferers. Allergologie Select, 5(01), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02284E
  5. Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., & Uyttenhove, P. (2021). A review of empirical studies of cultural ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112895
  6. Ciccarese, L., Rastelli, V., Iovino, F., & Piovesan, G. (2025). Regolamento dell’Unione europea per il Ripristino della Natura: Considerazioni per la sua attuazione nel settore forestale. L’Italia forestale e montana, 80(3), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.36253/ifm-1182
  7. Donzelli, G., & Suarez-Varela, M. M. (2024). Tropospheric Ozone: A Critical Review of the Literature on Emissions, Exposure, and Health Effects. Atmosphere, 15(7), 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070779
  8. Fang, J., & Lechowicz, M. J. (2006). Climatic limits for the present distribution of beech (Fagus L.) species in the world. Journal of Biogeography, 33(10), 1804–1819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01533.x
  9. Fitzky, A. C., Kaser, L., Peron, A., Karl, T., Graus, M., Tholen, D., ... & Rewald, B. (2023). Same, same, but different: Drought and salinity affect BVOC emission rate and alter blend composition of urban trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 80, 127842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127842
  10. Fitzky, A. C., Sandén, H., Karl, T., Fares, S., Calfapietra, C., Grote, R., ... & Rewald, B. (2019). The Interplay Between Ozone and Urban Vegetation - BVOC Emissions, Ozone Deposition, and Tree Ecophysiology. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2, 50. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00050
  11. Grylls, T., & Van Reeuwijk, M. (2022). How trees affect urban air quality: It depends on the source. Atmospheric Environment, 290, 119275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119275
  12. Hoshika, Y., Osada, Y., De Marco, A., Peñuelas, J., & Paoletti, E. (2018). Global diurnal and nocturnal parameters of stomatal conductance in woody plants and major crops. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12681
  13. Iungman, T., Cirach, M., Marando, F., Pereira Barboza, E., Khomenko, S., Masselot, P., ... & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2023). Cooling cities through urban green infrastructure: A health impact assessment of European cities. The Lancet, 401(10376), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02585-5
  14. Jiang, B., Cai, Y., Shi, Y., Zhai, Q., Huang, H., Peng, L., & Zhan, J. (2026). Characterization, sources, and driving factors of particulate matter (PM) pollution in a desert hinterland city: Insights from Hotan, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 161, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.10.024
  15. Jyethi, D. S. (2016). Air Quality: Global and Regional Emissions of Particulate Matter, SOx, and NOx. In U. Kulshrestha & P. Saxena (Eds.), Plant Responses to Air Pollution (pp. 5–19). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1201-3_2
  16. Kondo, M. C., Mueller, N., Locke, D. H., Roman, L. A., Rojas-Rueda, D., Schinasi, L. H., ... & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2020). Health impact assessment of Philadelphia’s 2025 tree canopy cover goals. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(4), e149–e157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30058-9
  17. Konijnendijk, C. C. (2023). Evidence-based guidelines for greener, healthier, more resilient neighbourhoods: Introducing the 3–30–300 rule. Journal of Forestry Research, 34(3), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01523-z
  18. Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., & Pozzer, A. (2015). The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 525(7569), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371
  19. Liang, D., & Huang, G. (2023). Influence of Urban Tree Traits on Their Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review. Land, 12(9), 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091699
  20. Lopez, M. A., Marco, A. D., Anav, A., Sorrentino, B., Paoletti, E., Manzini, J., ... & Sicard, P. (2025). The 3–30–300 rule Compliance: A geospatial tool for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 261, 105396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105396
  21. Manzini, J., Hoshika, Y., Carrari, E., Sicard, P., Watanabe, M., Tanaka, R., ... & Nicese, F. P. (2023). FlorTree: A unifying modelling framework for estimating the species-specific pollution removal by individual trees and shrubs. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 85, 127967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127967
  22. Massagué, J., Torre-Pascual, E., Carnerero, C., Escudero, M., Alastuey, A., Pandolfi, M., ... & Gangoiti, G. (2024). Extreme ozone episodes in a major Mediterranean urban area. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24(8), 4827–4850. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4827-2024
  23. Merilo, E., Jõesaar, I., Brosché, M., & Kollist, H. (2014). To open or to close: Species‐specific stomatal responses to simultaneously applied opposing environmental factors. New Phytologist, 202(2), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12667
  24. Mori, J., Fini, A., Galimberti, M., Ginepro, M., Burchi, G., Massa, D., & Ferrini, F. (2018). Air pollution deposition on a roadside vegetation barrier in a Mediterranean environment: Combined effect of evergreen shrub species and planting density. Science of The Total Environment, 643, 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.217
  25. Nguyen, D. H., Lin, C., Vu, C. T., Cheruiyot, N. K., Nguyen, M. K., Le, T. H., ... & Bui, X. T. (2022). Tropospheric ozone and NOx: A review of worldwide variation and meteorological influences. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 28, 102809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102809
  26. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Dadvand, P., Márquez, S., Bartoll, X., Barboza, E. P., Cirach, M., ... & Zijlema, W. L. (2022). The evaluation of the 3-30-300 green space rule and mental health. Environmental Research, 215, 114387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114387
  27. Percival, G. C., Keary, I. P., & AL-Habsi, S. (2006). An assessment of the drought tolerance of Fraxinus genotypes for urban landscape plantings. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 5(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.03.002
  28. Shahriyari, H. A., Nikmanesh, Y., Jalali, S., Tahery, N., Zhiani Fard, A., Hatamzadeh, N., ... & Mohammadi, M. J. (2022). Air pollution and human health risks: Mechanisms and clinical manifestations of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Toxin Reviews, 41(2), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2021.1887261
  29. Sicard, P., Agathokleous, E., Anenberg, S. C., De Marco, A., Paoletti, E., & Calatayud, V. (2023a). Trends in urban air pollution over the last two decades: A global perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 858, 160064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160064
  30. Sicard, P., Agathokleous, E., Araminiene, V., Carrari, E., Hoshika, Y., De Marco, A., & Paoletti, E. (2018). Should we see urban trees as effective solutions to reduce increasing ozone levels in cities? Environmental Pollution, 243, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.049
  31. Sicard, P., Agathokleous, E., De Marco, A., Paoletti, E., & Calatayud, V. (2021). Urban population exposure to air pollution in Europe over the last decades. Environmental Sciences Europe, 33(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00450-2
  32. Sicard, P., Coulibaly, F., Lameiro, M., Araminiene, V., De Marco, A., Sorrentino, B., Anav, A., Manzini, J., Hoshika, Y., Moura, B. B., & Paoletti, E. (2023b). Object-based classification of urban plant species from very high-resolution satellite imagery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 81, 127866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127866
  33. Sicard, P., Pascu, I.-S., Petrea, S., Leca, S., Marco, A. D., Paoletti, E., Agathokleous, E., & Calatayud, V. (2025). Effect of tree canopy cover on air pollution-related mortality in European cities: An integrated approach. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(6), e527–e537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00112-3
  34. Torkfar, P., & Russo, A. (2023). Assessing the benefits of climate-sensitive design with nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation in urban regeneration: A case study in Cheltenham, UK. Sustainability, 15(22), Articolo 15855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215855
  35. Zaldei, A., Vagnoli, C., Di Lonardo, S., Gioli, B., Gualtieri, G., Toscano, P., Martelli, F., & Matese, A. (2015). AIRQino, a low-cost air quality mobile platform (EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, p. 6158). https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015EGUGA..17.6158Z
  36. Zhang, K., & Batterman, S. (2013). Air pollution and health risks due to vehicle traffic. Science of The Total Environment, 450-451, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.074
  37. Zheng, Y., Lin T., Hamm N. A. S., Liu, J., Zhou, T., Geng, H., Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Quantitative evaluation of urban green exposure and its impact on human health: A case study on the 3–30–300 rule. Building and Environment, 247, Articolo 111005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171461
  38. Zhou, X., Sampath, V., & Nadeau, K. C. (2024). Effect of air pollution on asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 132(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2024.01.017