Vol. 81 No. 2 (2026)
Reviews

The impact of interior design materials on people's psychophysical well-being: a literature review on the use of wood

PDF (Italiano)
  • Vittorio Seravalle,
  • Elena Barbierato,
  • Sandro Sacchelli
Vittorio Seravalle
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali (DAGRI), Università degli Studi di Firenze; piazzale delle Cascine 18 - 50144 Firenze (Italy).
Elena Barbierato
DAGRI - Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali Università degli Studi di Firenze
Sandro Sacchelli
UNIFI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/ifm-1242

Published 2026-07-07

Keywords

  • PRISMA analysis,
  • forest ecosystem services,
  • psychology,
  • neurosciences,
  • wellbeing

How to Cite

Seravalle, V., Barbierato, E., & Sacchelli, S. (2026). The impact of interior design materials on people’s psychophysical well-being: a literature review on the use of wood. L’Italia Forestale E Montana, 81(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.36253/ifm-1242

Copyright (c) 2026 Vittorio Seravalle, Elena Barbierato, Sandro Sacchelli

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The use of wood as an interior design material offers numerous and well-known advantages in terms of improving thermal and acoustic comfort. In recent years, moreover, many studies have focused on wood as a material for improvement of psychological and physiological wellbeing. Quantifying these positive effects can lead to the valorisation of the raw material, with potential positive impacts on the forestry sector. Within these premises, the paper reports the results of a literature review on the topic of “wood and wellbeing”, investigating materials and methods applied in scientific research, as well as the sample of involved interviewees. This analysis highlights the main lines of research followed, the limitations of the applications, and potential future developments.

PDF (Italiano)

References

  1. Berger, G., Katz, H., Petutschnigg, A. J. (2006). What consumers feel and prefer: Haptic perception of various wood flooring surfaces. Forest Products Journal, 56(10): 42.
  2. Bergmann Tiest, W.M., Kappers, A.M.L. (2007). Haptic and Visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychologica, 124(2):177-89.
  3. Bhatta, S. R., Tiippana, K., Vahtikari, K., Hughes, M., Kyttä, M. (2017). Sensory and emotional perception of wooden surfaces through fingertip touch. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 367.
  4. Bowler, D., Buyung-Ali, L., Healey, J. R., Jones, J. P., Knight, T., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). The evidence base for community forest management as a mechanism for supplying global environmental benefits and improving local welfare. CEE review, 08-011.
  5. Burnard, M. D., Kutnar, A. (2015). Wood and human stress in the built indoor environment: a review. Wood Science and Technology, 49: 969-986.
  6. De Morais, I. C., Pereira, A. F. (2015). Perceived sensory characteristics of wood by consumers and trained evaluators. Journal of Sensory Studies, 30(6): 472-483.
  7. Demattè, M. L., Zanetti, M., Urso, T., Cavalli, R. (2022). Wooden Indoor Environments’ Restorativeness. Forests, 13(12): 2073.
  8. Fujisaki, W., Tokita, M., Kariya, K. (2015). Perception of the material properties of wood based on vision, audition, and touch. Vision research, 109: 185-200.
  9. Harris, K. L., Collier, E. S., Skedung, L., Rutland, M.W. (2021). A sticky situation or rough going? Influencing haptic perception of wood coatings through frictional and topographical design. Tribology letters, 69(3): 113.
  10. Hansmann, R., Hug, S. M., Seeland, K. (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4): 213-225.
  11. Hong, W., Zhu, S., Lu, D., Ieong, C. (2025). A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Forest Therapy Research: Investigating the Impact of Forest Environments on Human Physiological and Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 7(5): 434 – 452.
  12. Hu, Q.W., Li, X.H., Fang, H., Wan, Q. (2022). The tactile perception evaluation of wood surface with different roughness and shapes: a study using galvanic skin response. Wood Research 67(2):311-325.
  13. Huang, T., Zhou, C., Wang, X., Kaner, J. (2024). A study of visual perception based on colour and texture of reconstituted decorative veneer. Coatings, 14(1): 57.
  14. Ikei, H., Song, C., Miyazaki, Y. (2017a). Physiological effects of touching wood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7): 801.
  15. Ikei, H., Song, C., Miyazaki, Y. (2017b). Physiological effects of touching coated wood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7): 773.
  16. Ikei, H., Song, C., Miyazaki, Y. (2018a). Physiological effects of touching hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa). Journal of Wood Science, 64(3): 226-236.
  17. Ikei, H., Song, C., Miyazaki, Y. (2018b). Physiological effects of touching the wood of hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) with the soles of the feet. Int International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10): 2135.
  18. Ikei, H., Song, C., Miyazaki, Y. (2019). Physiological effects of touching sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) with the palm of the hand. Journal of Wood Science, 65(1): 48.
  19. Ikei, H., Miyazaki, Y. (2020). Positive physiological effects of touching sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) with the sole of the feet. Journal of Wood Science, 66(1): 29.
  20. Ikei, H., Nakamura, M., Miyazaki, Y. (2020). Physiological effects of visual stimulation using knotty and clear wood images among young women. Sustainability, 12(23): 9898.
  21. Ikei, H., Jo, H., Miyazaki, Y. (2023). Physiological Effects of Visual Stimulation by a Japanese Low Wooden Table: A Crossover Field Experiment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(14): 6351.
  22. Ikei, H., Jo, H., Miyazaki, Y. (2024). Psychological and physiological effects of sole contact with oil-finished wood. Journal of Wood Science, 70(1): 21.
  23. Kanaya, S., Kariya, K., Fujisaki, W. (2016). Cross-Modal Correspondence Among Vision, Audition, and Touch in Natural Objects: An Investigation of the Perceptual Properties of Wood. Perception, 45(10):1099-1114.
  24. Lindberg, S., Roos, A., Kihlstedt, A., Lindström, M. (2013). A product semantic study of the influence of the sense of touch on the evaluation of wood-based materials. Materials and Design, 52: 300-307.
  25. Mamić, D., Domljan, D. (2024). User Preferences on the Application of Wooden Wall Coverings in Interiors Made of Oak Veneer Residue. Buildings, 14(6): 1795.
  26. Miao, Y., Gao, X., Miao, T., Xu, W. (2024). A Study on the Visual and Tactile Perception of Oriented Strand Board Combined with Consumer-Preference Analysis. Coatings, 14(8): 1000.
  27. Nakamura, M., Ikei, H., Miyazaki, Y. (2019). Physiological effects of visual stimulation with full-scale wall images composed of vertically and horizontally arranged wooden elements. Journal of Wood Science, 65: 1-11.
  28. Nakamura, M., Ikei, H., Miyazaki, Y. (2022). Effects of visual stimulation using wooden-wall images with different amounts of knots on psychological and physiological responses. Wood Science and Technology, 56(6): 1869-1886.
  29. Naser, A. A., Al-Mamoori, H. S. (2023). The Role of Interior Design in Achieving Healthy Workplaces According to Lighting Indicators of "WELL Standard". International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 13(5): 953.
  30. Norman, J. F., Adkins, O. C., Hoyng, S. C., Dowell, C. J., Pedersen, L. E., Gilliam, A. N. (2016). Aging and the haptic perception of material properties. Perception, 45(12): 1387-1398.
  31. Nyrud, A.Q., Bringslimark, T. (2010). Is interior wood use psychologically beneficial? A review of psychological responses toward wood. Wood and Fiber Science, 42(2): 202-218.
  32. Ojala, A., Kostensalo, J., Viik, J., Matilainen, H., Wik, I., Virtanen, L., Muilu-Mäkelä, R. (2023). Psychological and physiological effects of a wooden office room on human well-being: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 89: 102059.
  33. Overvliet, K. E., Soto-Faraco, S. (2011). I can't believe this isn't wood! An investigation in the perception of naturalness. Acta Psychologica, 136(1): 95-111.
  34. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P., Moher, D., 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372: 71.
  35. Poirier, G., Demers, C.M., Potvin, A. (2019). Wood perception in daylit interior spaces: An experimental study using scale models and questionnaires. BioResources, 14(1): 1941-1968.
  36. Qin, J., Li, C., Wang, W., Yu, Y., Shen, D., Bao, D. (2024). Through the lens of color: Relationships between color properties and visual perception of wood (Acer.) figures. Materials and Design, 243: 113071.
  37. Roos, A., Lindberg, S., Kihlstedt, A. (2013). A product semantic study of the influence of vision on wood evaluation. Wood and Fiber Science, 45(4): 353-362.
  38. Sakuragawa, S., Miyazaki, Y., Kaneko, T., Makita, T. (2005). Influence of wood wall panels on physiological and psychological responses. Journal of Wood Science, 51: 136-140.
  39. Skedung, L., Harris, K. L., Collier, E. S., Rutland, M. W. (2020). The finishing touches: the role of friction and roughness in haptic perception of surface coatings. Experimental Brain Research, 238: 1511-1524.
  40. Tsunetsugu, Y., Miyazaki, Y., Sato, H. (2007). Physiological effects in humans induced by the visual stimulation of room interiors with different wood quantities. Journal of Wood Science, 53: 11-16.
  41. Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kagawa, T. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38: 1-9.
  42. Wan, Q., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Song, S., Ke, Q. (2021). Visual perception of different wood surfaces: an event-related potentials study. Annals of Forest Science, 78: 1-18.
  43. Xiong, N., Li, H., Gu, R. (2022). Study on Beech Wood Softening Perceptual Experience Based on the Change of Material Perceptual Elements. In: Design Studies and Intelligence Engineering: 383-395, IOS Press.
  44. Yan, D., Guo, Q. (2023). Effect of Indoor Wall Wood Coverage on the Elderly Group—A Case Study of Activity Rooms in Old-Age Buildings. Buildings, 13(8): 2086.