Vol. 81 No. 2 (2026)
Reviews

Can trees and shrubs make cities quieter? the role of urban forests in mitigating noise pollution

Mario Pagano
Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri, Consiglio Nazionale delle Riceche (IRET-CNR); via Madonna del Piano 10 - 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI).
Bio
Veronica Amodeo
Dipartimento di Architettura (DIDA), Università degli Studi di Firenze; via della Mattonaia 8 - 50121 Firenze.
Francesco Belli
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali (DAGRI), Università degli Studi di Firenze; Piazzale delle Cascine 18 - 50144 Firenze, Italia.
Giacomo Mocarli
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali (DAGRI), Università di Firenze, Piazzale delle Cascine 18, 50144 Firenze, Italia
Simone Secchi
Dipartimento di Architettura (DIDA), Università degli Studi di Firenze; via della Mattonaia 8 - 50121 Firenze.

Published 2026-07-07

Keywords

  • Urban forests,
  • Noise pollution,
  • Sound absorption,
  • Nature-based solutions (NBS)

How to Cite

Pagano, M., Amodeo, V., Belli, F., Mocarli, G., & Secchi, S. (2026). Can trees and shrubs make cities quieter? the role of urban forests in mitigating noise pollution . L’Italia Forestale E Montana, 81(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.36253/ifm-1238

Abstract

Environmental noise pollution is widely recognized as a major source of environmental degradation worldwide, with road traffic representing the predominant contributor in urban areas. Exposure to sound levels above 55 dBA is associated with significant health risks, including sleep disturbances, psychosocial stress, and cardiovascular effects, as highlighted by the World Health Organization. Urban green spaces have emerged as an effective strategy for mitigating noise exposure, not only through physical sound attenuation mechanisms but also by providing psychological restoration that can reduce perceived noise annoyance. Dense vegetation barriers - particularly multilayered arrangements combining trees, shrubs, and ground cover - can provide considerable attenuation at medium and high frequencies. Species selection is therefore crucial and must consider climatic suitability, evergreen foliage, rapid growth, and planting density. However, the acoustic performance of vegetation is limited by physiological stressors typical of urban environments, including drought, heat, and pollution, which reduce plant vitality and thus their ecosystem service provision. ISO 9613-2 provides standardized methods for estimating attenuation due to foliage, showing modest but measurable reductions that increase with forest density and frequency. Overall, when properly designed, maintained, and integrated with site specific acoustic conditions, vegetation represents a multifunctional and ecologically valuable tool for mitigating urban noise and improving environmental and human well-being. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to evaluate the acoustic mitigation potential of urban forests, analyzing both the physical and psychological mechanisms involved, species-specific performance, and the operational limitations imposed by urban stressors and standard international predictive models.

References

  1. Alabdallah, N. M., Alluqmani, S. M., Almarri, H. M., & AL-Zahrani, A. A. (2024). Physical, chemical, and biological routes of synthetic titanium dioxide nanoparticles and their crucial role in temperature stress tolerance in plants. Heliyon, 10(4), e26537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26537
  2. Biocca, M., Gallo, P., Di Loreto, G., Imperi, G., Pochi, D., & Fornaciari, L. (2019). Noise attenuation provided by hedges. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 50, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2019.889
  3. Cook, D. I. (1980). Trees, solid barriers, and combinations: alternatives for noise control. In Proceedings of the National Urban Forestry Conference, November 13–16, 1978, Washington D.C., USA (pp. 330–339). State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, ESF Publication 80-003.
  4. Cook, D. I., & Van Haverbeke, D. F. (1971). Trees and shrubs for noise abatement. Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin, 246. University of Nebraska.
  5. De Coensel, B., Vanwetswinkel, S., & Botteldooren, D. (2011). Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(4), EL148-EL153. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3567073
  6. Dzhambov, A., & Dimitrova, D. (2014). Urban green spaces’ effectiveness as a psychological buffer for the negative health impact of noise pollution: A systematic review. Noise and Health, 16, 157. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.134916
  7. Dzhambov, A. M., & Dimitrova, D. D. (2015). Green spaces and environmental noise perception. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 1000–1008.
  8. Erdogan, E., & Yazgan, M. (2009). Landscaping in reducing traffic noise problem in cities: Ankara case. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4, 1015–1022.
  9. Esmeray, E., & Eren, S. (2021). GIS-based mapping and assessment of noise pollution in Safranbolu, Karabuk, Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(10), 15413–15431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01303-5
  10. Fan, Y., Zhiyi, B., Zhu, Z., & Jiani, L. (2010). The investigation of noise attenuation by plants and the corresponding noise-reducing spectrum. Journal of Environmental Health, 72, 8–15.
  11. Fang, C.-F., & Ling, D.-L. (2003). Investigation of the noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(4), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00190-1
  12. Ferrini, F., Fini, A., Mori, J., & Gori, A. (2020). Role of vegetation as a mitigating factor in the urban context. Sustainability, 12, 4247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104247
  13. Fredianelli, L., Pizzo, L., & Licitra, G. (2019). Recent developments in sonic crystals as barriers for road traffic noise mitigation. Environments, 6, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6020014
  14. Gini, R., Passoni, D., Pinto, L., & Sona, G. (2012). Aerial images from an uav system: 3d modeling and tree species classification in a park area. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIX-B1, 361–366. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B1-361-2012
  15. Gołębiewski, R. (2007). Simple methods for determination of the acoustical properties of ground surfaces. Archives of Acoustics, 32, 827–837.
  16. Gratani, L., & Varone, L. (2013). Carbon sequestration and noise attenuation provided by hedges in Rome: the contribution of hedge traits in decreasing pollution levels. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 4(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2013.035
  17. Hörmann, V. J., Özgen-Xian, I., Beyer, M., Gerchow, M., Gillefalk, M., Hoppenbrock, J., Strohbach, M. W., Preidl, S., & Quambusch, M. (2025). Urban tree drought stress: A practitioner-focused review of detection and monitoring methods. Hydrological Processes, 39(10), e70298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7029
  18. Houtsma, A. J. M. (1997). Pitch and timbre: Definition, meaning and use. Journal of New Music Research, 26(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298219708570720
  19. Huda, S., Reddy, N., & Yang, Y. (2012). Ultra-light-weight composites from bamboo strips and polypropylene web with exceptional flexural properties. Composites Part B: Engineering, 43(3), 1658–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.017
  20. Irmak, M., & Yilmaz, H. (2008). Determination of the usability of woody plant species in Tortum - Creek Watershed for functional and aesthetical uses in the respect of landscape architecture. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Ataturk University, 39(2), 181-190.
  21. Joshi, A., Deshmukh, V., Joshi, D. N., & Rane Acharekar, P. (2013). Studies on foliar sound absorption capacities of some urban trees by impedance tube method. Pollution Research, 32, 419-424.
  22. Joshi, N. C., Joshi, A. N., & Bist, B. (2020). Phytomonitoring and mitigation of air pollution by plants. Semantic Scholar. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:226463369; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45669-6_5
  23. Jumingan, J., Dahlan, Z., & Setiabudidaya, D. (2016). Effect of architectural tree model to the noise level of motor vehicle on demang lebar daun street palembang. BIOVALENTIA: Biological Research Journal, 2(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.24233/BIOV.2.2.2016.35
  24. Khan, S., Fatima, K., Hussain, S., Ali, M., Mannan, A., & Butt, N. (2023). Mitigation of noise pollution in urban areas by strategically planting trees and shrubs. Journal CleanWAS, 7, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.26480/jcleanwas.01.2023.41.47
  25. Kopecká, R., Kameniarová, M., Černý, M., Brzobohatý, B., & Novák, J. (2023). Abiotic stress in crop production. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(7), 6603. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076603
  26. Kuperman, W., & Roux, P. (2007). Underwater acoustics. In T. D. Rossing (Ed.), Springer Handbook of Acoustics (pp. 149–204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30425-0_5
  27. Lanphear, F.O. (1971). Urban Vegetation: Values and Stresses. HortScience, 6(4), 332–334. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.6.4.332
  28. Maleki, K., & Hosseini, S. M. (2011). Investigation of the effects of leaves, branches and canopies of trees on noise pollution reduction. Environmental Sciences, 8(4), 39-52.
  29. Manasa, C., Salimath, S., Hegde, R., Dechamma, D., & Gooli, M. (2023). Roles of trees for abatement of environmental pollution: A review. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 14, 1403–1410. https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2023.4074
  30. Margaritis, E., & Kang, J. (2017). Relationship between green space-related morphology and noise pollution. Ecological Indicators, 72, 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.032
  31. Martínez-Sala, R., Rubio, C., García-Raffi, L. M., Sánchez-Pérez, J. V., Sánchez-Pérez, E. A., & Llinares, J. (2006). Control of noise by trees arranged like sonic crystals. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 291(1), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.05.030
  32. Miltiadou, M., Campbell, N. D. F., Gonzalez Aracil, S., Brown, T., & Grant, M. G. (2018). Detection of dead standing Eucalyptus camaldulensis without tree delineation for managing biodiversity in native Australian forest. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 67, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.01.008
  33. Muhammad, M., Waheed, A., Wahab, A., Majeed, M., Nazim, M., Liu, Y.-H., Li, L., & Li, W.-J. (2024). Soil salinity and drought tolerance: An evaluation of plant growth, productivity, microbial diversity, and amelioration strategies. Plant Stress, 11, 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100319
  34. Mutlu, Z., & Onder, S. (2012). Investigation of the noise reduction provided by bush belts in Konya, Turkey. Journal of International Environmental Application & Science, 7(1), 48–54.
  35. Nunho dos Reis, A., Biondi, D., & Oliveira, J. (2022). The role of urban green areas in noise pollution attenuation. DYNA, 89, 210–215. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v89n220.95822
  36. O’Brien, W. D. (2007). Ultrasound–biophysics mechanisms. Effects of Ultrasound and Infrasound Relevant to Human Health, 93(1), 212–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.010
  37. Ozer, S., Irmak, M. A., & Yilmaz, H. (2008). Determination of roadside noise reduction effectiveness of Pinus sylvestris L. and Populus nigra L. in Erzurum, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 144(1), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9978-6
  38. Pagano, M., & Del Prete, S. (2024). Symphonies of growth: Unveiling the impact of sound waves on plant physiology and productivity. Biology, 13(5), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13050326
  39. Pagano, M., Lunetta, E., Belli, F., Mocarli, G., Cocozza, C., & Cacciotti, I. (2025). Advancements in agricultural nanotechnology: An updated review. Plants, 14(18), 2939. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14182939
  40. Pandey, A. K., Pandey, M., Mishra, A., Tiwary, S. M., & Tripathi, B. D. (2015). Air pollution tolerance index and anticipated performance index of some plant species for development of urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 866–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.001
  41. Pathak, V., Tripathi, B. D., & Mishra, V. K. (2008). Dynamics of traffic noise in a tropical city Varanasi and its abatement through vegetation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 146(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0060-1
  42. Renterghem, T., Botteldooren, D., Cornelis, W., & Gabriels, D. (2003). Reducing screen-induced refraction of noise barriers in wind by vegetative screens. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 88, 231–238.
  43. Rokhina, E. V., Lens, P., & Virkutyte, J. (2009). Low-frequency ultrasound in biotechnology: State of the art. Trends in Biotechnology, 27(5), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.02.001
  44. Siddiqi, K. S., Husen, A., Zahra, N., & Moheman, A. (2025). Harnessing silicon nanoparticles and various forms of silicon for enhanced plant growth performance under salinity stress: Application and mechanism. Discover Nano, 20(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-025-04270-2
  45. Stuhlmacher, M., Woods, J., Yang, L., & Sarigai, S. (2024). How does the composition and configuration of green space influence urban noise?: A systematic literature review. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 9(4), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-024-00099-0
  46. Tadeu, A., Carrilho, J., Cortês, A., Ferreira, F., & Almeida, J. (2024). Acoustic absorption, scattering, and diffusion provided by green roof systems. Building and Environment, 262, 111778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111778
  47. UN UNI EN ISO 717-1:2021. (2021). Acustica - Valutazione dell’isolamento acustico in edifici e di elementi di edificio - Parte 1: Isolamento acustico per via aerea. UNI.
  48. UNI ISO 9613-2:2024. (2024). Acustica - Attenuazione sonora nella propagazione all’aperto - Parte 2: Metodo tecnico progettuale per la previsione di livelli di pressione sonora all’aperto. UNI.
  49. Van Renterghem, T., & Botteldooren, D. (2016). View on outdoor vegetation reduces noise annoyance for dwellers near busy roads. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.018
  50. Wang, Y., Mei, M., Ni, Y., & Kokot, S. (2014). Combined NIR/MIR analysis: A novel method for the classification of complex substances such as Illicium verum Hook. F. and its adulterants. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 130, 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2014.04.062
  51. Whittingham, T. A. (2007). Medical diagnostic applications and sources. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 93(1), 84–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.004
  52. World Health Organization. (2009). Night noise guidelines for Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  53. Yasin, I., Hendro Widaryanto, L., & Sutrisno, W. (2020). The technique of green belt bamboo constructions for highway noise effect reductions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1456, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012006
  54. Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Li, R., Ge, Y., Li, Y., & Li, R. (2023). Plants’ response to abiotic stress: Mechanisms and strategies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(13), 10915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310915
  55. Zhu, J., Wang, S., Wu, S., Lu, C., Jiang, J., & Zhou, S. (2019). Response of dust particle pollution and construction of a leaf dust deposition prediction model based on leaf reflection spectrum characteristics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(36), 36764–36775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06635-4