Vol. 81 No. 3 (2026)
Insights

Ecosystem transilience: a conceptual framework for adaptive forest management under climate change

Marco Borghetti
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari e Ambientali (DAFE), Università della Basilicata; viale dell’Ateneo Lucano 10 - 85100 Potenza (Italy)

Published 2026-11-13

Keywords

  • ecosytem state transition,
  • adaptive forest management,
  • climate change,
  • ecosystem functions,
  • restoration

How to Cite

Borghetti, M. (2026). Ecosystem transilience: a conceptual framework for adaptive forest management under climate change. L’Italia Forestale E Montana, 81(3), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.36253/ifm-1271

Abstract

This note proposes the notion of ecosystem transilience as an interpretive framework for forest management under climate change. The term is first traced to its origins in innovation studies, where it described the capacity of major innovations to reshape resources, competencies, and market relations, and is then connected to ecological concepts such as resilience, transformability, and post-disturbance reorganization. Building on this background, the note argues that ecosystem transilience offers a complementary lens for describing the process through which a forest ecosystem moves across a state transition while reorganizing its structures, processes, and functions under changing environmental constraints. Rather than replacing resilience or transformability, it focuses more explicitly on the transition itself and on the possibilities for its active management. A simple conceptual representation is proposed to distinguish resilience, understood as persistence within a domain of ecologically viable configurations, from transilience, understood as the quality of a transition toward new viable configurations while seeking to maintain or reconstitute priority ecosystem functions under uncertainty. Italian forests are presented as a particularly relevant testing ground for this perspective. Their marked biogeographical diversity, the widespread occurrence of structurally simplified stands, and the growing pressure of drought, fire, and climate-driven disturbance make it increasingly difficult to assume that maintaining current forest configurations is always realistic or desirable. Within this context, Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 on nature restoration is interpreted as a policy framework consistent with a transilience perspective. The note identifies four practical implications: defining environmental operating limits; establishing context-specific portfolios of ecosystem functions; accompanying transitions through silvicultural interventions; and developing adaptive indicators capable of monitoring ecosystem change and the quality of functions delivered during transition. Taken together, these elements position ecosystem transilience as a concept that can help bridge ecological theory, adaptive forest management, and restoration policy at a time of accelerating environmental change.

References

  1. Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/
  2. 1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6
  3. Batllori, E., Lloret, F., Aakala, T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Aynekulu, E., Bendixsen, D. P., Bentouati, A., Bigler, C., Burk, C. J., Camarero, J. J., Colangelo, M., Coop, J. D., Fensham, R., Floyd, M. L., Galiano, L., Ganey, J. L., Gonzalez, P., Jacobsen, A. L., Kane, J. M., . . . Zeeman, B. (2020). Forest and woodland replacement patterns following drought-related mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(47), 29720-29729. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002314117
  4. Borghetti, M., Colangelo, M., Ripullone, F., & Rita, A. (2021). Ondate di siccità e calore, spunti per una selvicoltura adattativa. Forest@, 18, 49-57. https://foresta.sisef.org/contents/?id=efor0054-018
  5. Bower, A. D., Frerker, K. L., Pike, C. C., Labonte, N. R., Palik, B. J., Royo, A. A., Anderson, S. M., Ferreira, A. R., & Brandt, L. A. (2024). A practical framework for applied forestry assisted migration. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 7, Article 1454329. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1454329
  6. Ciancio, O. (2011). La selvicoltura sistemica. Aspetti filosofici, epistemologici, metodologici. L’Italia Forestale e Montana, 66(3), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.4129/ifm.2011.3.01
  7. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
  8. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
  9. Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In P. C. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints (pp. 31-44). National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4919
  10. Messier, C., Puettmann, K. J., & Coates, K. D. (Eds.). (2013). Managing forests as complex adaptive systems: Building resilience to the challenge of global change. Routledge.
  11. Millar, C. I., Stephenson, N. L., & Stephens, S. L. (2007). Climate change and forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications, 17(8), 2145-2151. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1715.1
  12. Pimm, S. L. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307(5949), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1038/307321a0
  13. Schuurman, G. W., Cole, D. N., Cravens, A. E., Covington, S., Crausbay, S. D., Hawkins Hoffman, C., Lawrence, D. J., Magness, D. R., Morton, J. M., Nelson, E. A., & O’Malley, R. (2022). Navigating ecological transformation: Resist-Accept-Direct as a path to a new resource management paradigm. BioScience, 72(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab067
  14. Seidl, R., & Turner, M. G. (2022). Post-disturbance reorganization of forest ecosystems in a changing world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(28), Article e2202190119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202190119
  15. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266
  16. (199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  17. Travaglini, D., Borghetti, M., & Piovesan, G. (2026). Interventi selvicolturali per il miglioramento delle foreste semplificate e la valorizzazione della biodiversità. L’Italia Forestale e Montana, 81(1s), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.36253/ifm-1203
  18. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
  19. Zezza, R. (2026). Il potere della transilienza: Trasferire le competenze tra i ruoli della vita. FrancoAngeli.
  20. Zezza, R., & Vitullo, A. (2014). MAAM: La maternità è un master che rende più forti uomini e donne. BUR Rizzoli.