Vol. 77 No. 4 (2022)
Articles

The role of agroforestry areas in the potential provision of ecosystem services: the case of the Molise Region.

Angelo Marucci
Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio, Università del Molise, contrada Fonte Lappone, 86090 Pesche, Isernia.

Published 2022-10-14

Keywords

  • Land cover changes,
  • transition categories,
  • ecosystem services,
  • payment for ecosystem services,
  • GIS analysis

Abstract

Changes in land use and land cover represent the main cause of the loss of natural capital and the ecosystem services supply. Analyzing the dynamics and impacts of these changes is also important with respect to the implementation of the D.lgs 34/2018, which recognizes ecosystem services generated by forests and identifies payments for ecosystem services as innovative tools for sustainable forest management. mapping, quantification, and economic valuation of ecosystem services. In our study, we analyzed the change in the supply of ecosystem services in relation to land use and land cover dynamics that occurred between 1960 and 2018 in the Molise Region. 

To do this type of analysis, we employed a methodology based on the GIS analysis of the agroforestry landscape transformation processes and qualitative matrices of potential supply of ecosystem services linked to land cover. The results obtained could be functional to the prediction of future scenarios and to the identification of adaptive strategies for the mitigation of impacts due to land cover changes at regional and national scales.

References

  1. Amato, V., Aucelli, P. P. C., Bracone, V., Cesarano, M., & Rosskopf, C. M., 2017 - Long-term landscape evolution of the Molise sector of the central-southern Apennines, Italy. Geologica Carpathica, 68(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/geoca-2017-0003.
  2. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B., 2006 - Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1146-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x. PMID: 16972878.
  3. Burkhard, B., Santos-Martin, F., Nedkov, S., & Maes, J., 2018 - An operational framework for integrated Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES). One Ecosystem, 3, e22831. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831.
  4. Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., & Müller, F., 2014 - Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online, 34(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201434.
  5. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F., 2012 - Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
  6. Costanza, R., dArge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., Oneill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., 1997 - The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260.
  7. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., Turner, R.K., 2014 - Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 152–158.
  8. de Groot, R., Brander, L., Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., McVittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L.C., Brink, P., van Beukering, P., 2012 - Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 50–61.
  9. Geri F., Giordano M., Nucci A., Rocchini D., Chiarucci A., 2008 - Analisi multitemporale del paesaggio forestale della Provincia di Siena mediante l’utilizzo di cartografie storiche. Forest@-Journal of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, 5 (1): 82-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3832/efor0508-0050082.
  10. Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M., 2010 - The Links between Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being. In: Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, 110-139. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007.
  11. Han, Z., Song, W., Deng, X.Z., Xu, X.L., 2017 - Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem service within the three-rivers headwater region. China. Water 9 (8), 558–572.
  12. Mendoza-González G., Martínez M.L., Lithgow D., Pérez-Maqueo O., Simonin P., 2012 - Land use change and its effects on the value of ecosystem services along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Ecological Economics, 82, 23-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.018.
  13. Mendoza, M.E., Granados, E.L., Geneletti, D., Pérez-Salicrup, D.R., Salinas, V., 2011 - Analysing land cover and land use change processes at watershed level: a multi temporal study in the Lake Cuitzeo Watershed, Mexico (1975–2003). Applied Geography 31, 37–50.
  14. Metzger M.J., Rounsevell M.D.A., Acosta-Michlik L., Leemans R., Schröter D., 2006 - The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114 (1): 69-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025.
  15. Marchetti M., 2011 – Radici globali. La Nuova Ecologia, vol.31: 45-46.
  16. Marino D., Palmieri M., Marucci A., Tufano M., 2021 - Comparison between Demand and Supply of Some Ecosystem Services in National Parks: A Spatial Analysis Conducted Using Italian Case Studies. Conservation, 2021, 1, 36–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation1010004.
  17. Marino, D.; Palmieri, M., 2016 - Investing in nature: Working with public expenditure and private payments for a new governance model. In Re-connecting Natural and Cultural Capital Contributions from Science and Policy; Paracchini, M.L., Zingari, P.C., Blasi, C., Eds.; Office of Publications of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016.
  18. Marino, D., Nofroni L., Savelli S., 2016 - Trasformazione e permanenze dei paesaggi agrari tradizionali alla scala nazionale. Un'indagine diacronica 1960-2012. Conference paper in le Sfide dell’antropocene: il ruolo dell’ecologia del paesaggio. Congresso Internazionale SIEP-IALE, Asti, http://siep-iale.it/_media/atti-siep-asti-challenges-of-antropocene-2016.pdf.
  19. Mooney, H., Larigauderie, A., Cesario, M., Elmquist, T., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Lavorel, S., Mace, G. M., Palmer, M., Scholes, R., & Yahara, T., 2009 - Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.006.
  20. Pereira, H.M., Navarro, L.M., Santos-Martins, I., 2012 - Global biodiversity change: the bad, the good, and the unknown. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511.
  21. Schirpke, U.; Marino, D.; Marucci, A.; Palmieri, M., 2018 - Positive effects of payments for ecosystem services on biodiversity and socioeconomic development: Examples from Natura 2000 sites in Italy. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 34, 96–105
  22. Schirpke U., Scolozzi R., De Marco C., 2013- Analisi dei servizi ecosistemici nei siti pilota. Parte 4: Selezione dei servizi ecosistemici. Report del progetto Making Good Natura (LIFE+11 ENV/IT/000168), EURAC research, Bolzano, 43.
  23. Schirpke, U., Leitinger, G., Tasser, E., Schermer, M., Steinbacher, M., & Tappeiner, U., 2013 - Multiple ecosystem services of a changing Alpine landscape: Past, present and future. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 9(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.751936.
  24. Tomao A., Carbone F., Marchetti M., Santopuoli G., Angelaccio C., Agrimi M., 2013 - Boschi, alberi forestali, esternalità e servizi ecosistemici. L’Italia Forestale e Montana, 68 (2): 57-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.4129/ifm.2013.2.01.
  25. Vizzarri M., Sallustio L., Tognetti R., Paganini E., Garfì V., La Mela Veca D.S., Munafò M., Santopuoli G., Marchetti M., 2015 - Adaptive forest governance to face land use change impacts in Italy: a review. L’Italia Forestale e Montana, 70 (4): 237-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.4129/ifm.2015.4.01